What
is wrong with our education?
Henry Wijaya ;
The
writer holds a master’s degree in international educational development from
the Teachers College, Columbia University
|
JAKARTA
POST, 20 September 2014
As an Indonesian citizen who recently
completed studies in a graduate school of education, I frequently ask myself,
what is the problem with Indonesia’s education?
The question is based on the following
assumptions. First, that Indonesia’s education has a problem and second, that
something has to be done to fix that problem.
I find it problematic to come up with a
clear-cut list of multilayered problems in Indonesia’s education. It’s even
more problematic when those who ask these questions decide the answers, which
include low teacher quality (the easiest to blame), a poorly crafted
curriculum (the easiest to criticize), a lack of equal infrastructure (we all
know how enormous Indonesia is, thank you) and the unsatisfactory performance
of the Education and Culture Ministry.
Further, many of those who ask the
questions even presuppose solutions like: “Let’s drill the teachers even
harder,” “Let’s blame the curriculum even more and propose a new curriculum,”
“Why don’t we bully the ministry even more?” or everyone’s favorite, “Let’s
internationalize our education,” whatever that even means.
Yet, our problem lies even deeper than
these suggestions.
To define what is wrong with our national
education is to define first what we need education for. Only after that will
we know what it means for us and we can prescribe further actions to take.
Human capital theorists say education is
meant to prepare students to be economically independent and participate in
their society’s economic development. The students are capital and education
is a means to add more value to that capital.
The final products are individuals ready
for the workforce. The expected impact of such products is that they become
capable of economically fulfilling their needs and supporting their country.
In short, education is an economic
investment.
Then there are the idealists, or the
romanticists, for whom education is about giving students all the opportunities
they need to discover their true passions and to empower them to achieve
those passions. This theory presupposes that every individual has a sacred
dream to achieve.
Education, hence, is the tool that
facilitates self-discovery. The final products are the persistent
dream-pursuers.
The expected results are achieving the
dream and gaining genuine happiness. As Paulo Coelho said, “the whole
universe will conspire to help those dreamers seek their dreams.”
The rise of radical religious groups
suggest that education is a process of transferring moral or religious values
from superior beings who supposedly know better to those who know less. The
students are blank vessels — inexperienced beings. The superior beings pour
content into the minds of these vessels and, voila, we have people with good
moral and religious devotion.
These enlightened people are expected to
contribute to the rise of a holy country where heaven reigns on Earth. Next
we have the definition of the human rights activists: education is to train
the students to be aware of each other’s rights and to be able to take action
to defend such rights. From passive, silent or oppressed students, education
transforms them and empowers them to be active. In the final form are
students who are aware, ready and brave enough to guard each other’s rights.
The expected result is a community in which members coexist peacefully in
tolerance.
The list of educational definitions could
go on. But at the very core, education is simply to enable students to grow
with critical thinking. In our context, it is crucial that education provides
children with the tools to develop critical minds. So, what does it mean?
Students with critical thinking are aware of both their choices and their
consequences. Some might prioritize financial crises in their family and thus
seek practical training to be able to work.
Some might not have troubles financially or
do not think about it so much and prioritize their passions. They are
critically aware of their actions and try to be prepared for the difficulties
ahead.
These students dare to dream high, but also
to rationally evaluate their dreams. Students with critical thinking do not
take for granted what people preach to them. They might study the theology of
a religion and eventually devote themselves fully, but never because someone
else indoctrinates them.
They do not easily buy the narrow
interpretations of religion that condemn other followers, that discriminate
the other gender or that promote violence.
Such students are aware of their own rights
and responsibilities. They understand that other people also have such rights
and do not shout for respect while stepping on others. They are aware of the
world they live in with its political, economic and social issues. They let
this awareness become a basis for their action too, as they desire to
transform themselves as well as the world they live in for the better.
A generation of young and active
individuals with critical minds to better address the diverse issues in our
country is what Indonesia truly needs.
Here the students themselves will decide
what education is for them personally, releasing them from any boxes. The
students become free individuals who are critical of themselves as well as of
others.
The expected impacts are unlimited, but for
the better. Education is never about teachers trying to shape these students
based on our teachers’ standards and preferences.
True education trusts the students to
decide by themselves. We, as teachers, are just there to assist them whenever
they need support.
Furthermore, teachers are there to create a
safe learning space full of opportunities, experiences and challenges. This
is what education is for and what education should be for. The answer to the
question of what is wrong with our education is simple: it is wrong when it
does not let the students grow with critical thinking. ●
|
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar