Is
Indonesia losing the race?
Benjamin Davis ;
The writer is international
development coordinator (Southeast Asia) at the University of Sydney; He
worked with at AusAID/ DFAT across a number of programs in Canberra and
Jakarta from 2009–2014 and was recently a participant in the Conference for
Australian Indonesian Youth (CAUSINDY) in Jakarta.
|
JAKARTA
POST, 25 September 2014
Public diplomacy
is a key pillar of a country’s foreign policy toolkit. In a world where
non-state actors – foreign publics, media, NGOs, civil society organizations
and multinational corporations — are increasingly important, soft power
initiatives — outreach activities directed at foreign nations to enhance a
country’s international reputation — are increasingly prominent in the
foreign policy landscape.
There are a
variety of these soft power tools available to governments: social media and
international broadcasting channels that promote their culture and language,
competitions, awards, cultural and language fairs, musical performances, and
cultural councils and centers. While the benefits of these initiatives are
hard to measure, it is clear that they have the ability to attract foreign
investment, business, tourist, employees and students.
The public
diplomacy landscape has traditionally been dominated by rich developed
nations like the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, France, Japan,
Spain and the United States. But the global order is changing.
China is its
biggest challenge, investing significant amounts of time and funds into
public diplomacy efforts at home and abroad, establishing over 1,000
Confucius Institutes and classrooms in 120 countries, and pouring huge
amounts of money into their foreign broadcaster. But it isn’t the only one.
Korea is not
far behind building its positive global image through the establishment of
Korean Cultural Centers and promotion of “K-Pop”. Others have done well
through tourism campaigns like the ‘Malaysia Truly Asia’ or ‘Incredible
India’. Thailand, despite recent political upheaval, has traditionally done
well through its culinary diplomacy strategy, and more recent strategies
aimed at promoting the country’s friendly people and its desirability as a
destination for medical makeovers.
Indonesia is
losing the public diplomacy battle. You only need to look at how most
Australians view Indonesia — through the prism of security, beef sagas,
terrorism, natural disasters, and drug smugglers — to see the vacuum left
when a country does little to promote itself to the outside world.
While there
have been piecemeal efforts to promote its culture through Indonesian arts
and culture and scholarships and some culinary and fashion diplomacy, its
national brand abroad has been crafted around its uniqueness as a place where
Islam and democracy co-exist peacefully.
Indonesian
leaders have tended to focus their attention on other foreign political
elites through foreign policy initiatives like the Bali Democracy Forum and
interfaith dialogues rather than promote cultural diplomacy.
But if you ask
long term Indonesia admirers what attracts them to the country, answers touch
on the blend of culture, diverse religion, food and friendly people.
Indonesia is the land of exceptions (tanah perkecualian). But it can do much
more than promote its diversity. Others are fascinated by the amazing
diversity of the archipelago from Sharia-ruled Aceh to the pigs running
around in West Papua.
And then
there’s the wayang (puppet show) and gamelan, the plethora of traditional
dances, amazing wildlife, mystical beliefs, the beautiful countryside, the
ease of learning the language and the joy Indonesians take in foreigners’
attempts to speak it. These people-to-people links are the bedrock of
relationships between Indonesia and the outside world. Just imagine what
Indonesia could do if more people knew of these hidden treasures.
What Indonesia
should do is take a leaf out of China’s book and join the charm offensive war
being battled out by other global and regional powers. Instead, it has chosen
to not to open itself to the outside world. The complex regulations for
research and study permits are clear indicators that Indonesia does not want
to open up to others.
Indonesia
can’t be blamed for focusing on major concerns like lifting large numbers of
people out of poverty, ensuring every kid can go to school, delivering better
healthcare, providing better infrastructure, reducing corruption and
environmental degradation, and combatting terrorism and natural disasters.
But times are changing.
Indonesia is
projected to be the eighth biggest economy in the world by 2030 and there is
a growing confidence in Indonesia of its potential to be a regional and
global power. Indonesia has made a positive start announcing that it would
establish 10 rumah budaya Indonesia (Indonesian cultural centers) in the
United States, Germany, the Netherlands, France, Turkey, Japan, Timor Leste,
Singapore, Myanmar and Australia.
There is a
real opportunity to put some ballast behind these centres to ensure a
positive face for Indonesia in foreign countries. The United States spends
around half a billion dollars on public diplomacy efforts annually through
its public diplomacy division.
While it would
not be realistic to expect anywhere near the same amount of expenditure in
Indonesia, increasing funding for cultural activities (pencak silat martial
art, Indonesian language, culture, religious diversity, dance, food, music
and film) in Indonesian consulates and embassies, educational and
professional exchange programs, and targeted digital strategies to engage
foreign publics, will ensure a positive image for Indonesia around the globe.
With the new
Joko “Jokowi” Widodo administration coming on board soon, it will be crucial
for the new Foreign Minister to ensure that momentum is maintained.
Outgoing
President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono has done a great deal to cement a positive
image of Indonesia as a democratic Islamic nation; but this won’t be enough
to compete in the public diplomacy battle being waged into the future. ●
|
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar