Taking
flight, or grounded by delay?
Michael
Horn ; The writer heads the Indonesian practice of Clyde
& Co., a leading aviation law firm;
A specialist in infrastructure development and finance, he has worked
on Indonesian projects since 1992; His experience includes Brisbane,
Melbourne, Perth, Sydney and Wellington airports
|
JAKARTA
POST, 31 Mei 2014
When
should a city burdened with a congested, undersized airport not welcome
planned airport construction?
Surprisingly, when there is too much of it.
If
competing planners have their way, Jakarta, a megacity in dire need of
additional airport capacity, may find itself with too much planned capacity.
With two major, and competing, West Java airport projects under discussion,
the planned expansion at Soekarno-Hatta International Airport and the Air
Force’s Halim Perdanakusuma Airport now open for domestic commercial flights,
one might conclude that long-suffering Jakarta may eventually be spoiled for
choice.
Airport
operators, public private partnership investors and airlines know that too
much capacity from duplicative airports represents serious risk to their
business models.
If too
much capacity is planned, demand will be diluted and nothing might get built.
If too little is planned, Jakartans will be underserved. Planners will need a
Goldilocks touch to ensure investors can make money, financiers will lend it
and airlines don’t lose it.
Airports
deliver essential public services that are usually monopolistic in nature.
They
require heavy capital investments that can take decades to be fully recouped.
If the natural monopoly is undermined at the planning stage, private sector
investors will steer clear.
The
competing West Java projects give rise to the greatest concern. If dueling
projects threaten to poach from the same catchment pool, neither might look
commercially viable and both might fail to take wing.
These
airport projects, Karawang International Airport and Kertajati International
Airport (also known as West Java International Airport, or Majalengka
Airport) for several years have been the subject of a behind-the-scenes
collision between national and regional ambitions.
Karawang
airport is championed by the national government and Japan (through the Japan
International Cooperation Agency). Conceptualized as a major international
gateway airport that will handle 60 million passengers a year, it is intended
to serve Jakarta, Bandung and West Java generally.
Although
70 kilometers east of Jakarta (twice the distance from Soekarno-Hatta to
downtown Jakarta), Japan has impressive plans to connect Karawang airport to
Jakarta via high-speed rail. It is also close to Cimalaya Port, for which the
Japanese also have grand plans. The Japanese plans even envision that
national government offices may move from congested Jakarta to a new
satellite town near Karawang airport.
It is a
beguiling prospect and worthy of serious consideration.
The
price tag is very, very high, but Japanese Official Development Assistance
(ODA) would go a long way toward covering the cost.National government
support is of course also meaningful for success.
But the
support of the West Java government is also crucial. Karawang airport
requires a site permit from it, and with Kertajati favored by West Java, it
make not be forthcoming. Kertajati airport is strongly supported by the West
Java regional administration, with foreign interest from Korea. Kertajati
Airport is conceptualized as a much smaller airport of between one-fifth and
one-third Karawang airport’s size and targets the Bandung/West Java catchment
area.
Kertajati
would be the nucleus of a new town development as well. The West Java
government proposes to develop a 1,800 hectare site, with 75 percent of it
for non-aeronautical purposes, such as industrial, commercial, residential,
recreational and cultural uses. These
plans are perhaps more aspirational than the Karawang airport plans, but not without
merit. West Java’s industry and population make it a heavyweight among
Indonesian provinces, and it makes sense for it to think big.
Located
much further east from Jakarta than Karawang airport, common catchment
passenger sharing between Soekarno-Hatta and Kertajati is projected to be
less than 2 percent. This would mean Kertajati may do much to benefit West
Java but little to improve Jakarta’s air services.
Karawang
airport’s catchment area overlaps Soekarno-Hatta’s area by about a third, and
a study suggests passenger sharing could be as great as 40 percent. This is
good news, as it means Karawang airport will relieve pressure on
Soekarno-Hatta.
But
Karawang airport’s catchment area also overlaps with about a third of the
area from which Kertajati will draw its potential customers. And therein lies
the nub of the problem. If building both runs the risk of neither achieving
passenger targets, planners for both airports will struggle to present a
feasible business case to investors.
This in
turn endangers the probability of either being built.
Japan
has experienced three-cornered airport competition similar to that shaping up
in Java. Kansai, Osaka (Itami) and Kobe airports are reportedly in similar
straits with less than optimum passenger loads, with the newest one Kobe
operating well below capacity.
Airlines
have been affected too, with Japan Airlines (JAL) and All Nippon Airways
(ANA) having to buy less efficient mid-sized aircraft to spread passenger
loads over three airports, only to cut back on flights.
Just how
these competing interests will be resolved remains to be seen. Location alone
suggests Karawang airport is the better choice as Jakarta’s second airport,
and its ability to receive funding support further suggests Karawang airport will
prevail. But it will still need the crucial permit, and support, from the
West Java government for this. Kertajati may well have a future as a regional
airport, replacing Bandung’s existing airport.
Meanwhile
Japanese interests will likely continue to develop momentum on an impressive
array of projects proposed for Jakarta, of which Karawang airport is but one,
and non-Japanese interests will weigh promoting alternatives or teaming up
with Japanese partners on their projects.
After
such a long drought in building projects on this scale, Indonesians should be
pleased to see that the level of interest in new projects is high. The trick,
as noted, is in the Goldilocks planning to provide a commercially attractive
project that is just right for investors. ●
|
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar