A
critical, not apathetic public, behind low turnout
Wawan Sobari ; A
lecturer in politics at Brawijaya University in Malang, East Java; Currently
researching public sector reform for his PhD at the department of politics
and public policy, Flinders University, in Adelaide, Australia
|
JAKARTA
POST, 13 April 2014
The
downward trend of voters hovered over Wednesday’s legislative elections. The
last election in 2009 recorded the lowest participation level, or 70.96
percent, of the post-New Order, declining by 21.78 percent compared to the
1999 elections.
Two main
reasons for this decline are that first, voters are busy with other
activities and second, voters have intentionally decided not to vote, feeling
that no result could bring about meaningful changes.
With
election day now deemed a public holiday, turnout should have increased
rather than declined. However, past attempts, such as the holiday on April 9,
2009, followed by successive holidays for Ascension Day and the weekend, did
not succeed in bolstering participation either.
The
assumption that citizens have chosen not to vote is more logical.
The
first election in the post-New Order signified improved awareness and expectation
for change. The elections succeeded to attract 92.74 percent of voters to the
polling station. However, when the elected legislators proved unable to
fulfill demands for change, participation began to dwindle.
The 1999
elections saw the highest turnout at 91.17 percent, exceeding the average of
participation rates of six elections during the New Order, from 1971 to 1997.
Consequently,
widespread citizens’ apathy is less relevant to the decline of turnout than
the argument of public criticism against the poor performance of those in
power. With press and public freedom, citizens can independently evaluate the
performance of their elected representatives.
Today’s
higher public criticism also explains the emerging phenomenon of non-linier
politics. According to David Chandler, this is the symptom of “democracy
unbounding”.
The
government and legislative bodies are considered incapable of governing and
directing people, who are increasingly plural and able to create new public
spaces. He writes that democratic discourse focuses more “on the formation of
plural and diverse publics in the private and social sphere”. This is, he
adds, a “non-linear” approach in which “democracy is no longer seen to
operate to constitute a collective will standing above society but as a
mechanism to distribute power more evenly through the social empowerment of
individuals and communities as the ultimate decision-makers.”
Dissatisfied
with the performance of their elected legislature and government, people take
advantage of democratic spaces to voice symbolic criticism. They create
community-based activities outside formal institutions. In other words,
individuals and communities are encouraged to make changes based on the
non-representative mechanism. They voice their choices via alternative and
creative activities in the name of a particular community.
The
existence of the Bandung Creative City Forum (BCCF) established by diverse
creative communities in Bandung, West Java, in late 2008 is a good example.
The BCCF is the brainchild of independent communities and aims to benefit the
public. Some of its independent activities, at least, have taken over the
role of formal institutions, such as the role of city planning and
infrastructure improvement, which support the growth of the creative economy
in the municipality.
Another
feature of non-linear politics is low or non-affiliation to politics.
Creatives are unwilling to be segregated by political interests and prefer a
common need and demand to bond their criticism.
Therefore,
stronger criticism among the public better explains declining turnout than
apathy. The assumption that a lack of promotion degrades voters as ignorant:
This assumption further underestimates the benefits of contemporary openness.
Moreover, the emerging creativity and criticism among communities is a
challenge for the next elected legislators, parties and government at all
levels. ●
|
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar