Continuing
the fight against corruption
(Part
2 0f 2)
Fritz Siregar ;
The
writer, a former judicial associate to the Constitutional Court, is currently
completing his PhD at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia
|
JAKARTA
POST, 16 September 2014
In
the early years of his presidency, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono was focused on
the anti graft war. In 2013 alone, the Corruption Eradication Commission
(KPK) received 1,400 graft reports, one of which involved a bass guitar from
Metallica band member Roberto Trujilo, presented to Jakarta Governor Joko
“Jokowi” Widodo.
As
of July 31, the KPK had received 1,154 graft reports; 536 of the reported
cases led to the KPK deciding the items were state property.
Discriminatory
law enforcement and gratification are related and have cause and affect.
The
failure to properly manage graft reporting and enforce harsh punishment for
public officials who fail to report graft likely provides more opportunities
for discriminatory law enforcement.
Failure
to report graft by public servants and state officials is not an ethical
issue anymore. It is against the law! Their failure to report graft is a
breach of their oath of government, thus is an indication of how well a
government officer performs his or her duties.
Several
existing laws need to be updated, partly as they are a product of the old
colonial regime and as a new legal context for the legislature is needed to
accommodate the latest improvements.
The
Criminal Law Procedure and Criminal Code are both currently under discussion
at the House of Representatives.
The
draft code, which has been part of the National Legislation Program
(Prolegnas) since 2010, needs to be carefully examined.
Does
it support the protection and enrichment of law enforcement, or diminish it?
Unless the enactment of the draft becomes the agenda of the new government,
the loopholes in existing procedural and criminal law will continue to exist.
Failure
to report graft has also been traced to the significant increase in the
wealth of public officials.
Existing
law does not recognize the concept of “illicit enrichment”, a term that has
been defined and regulated under the UN Convention Against Corruption
(UNCAC).
However,
eradicating illicit enrichment can only be effective if it is linked with
asset and income declaration. Government officials are obliged to submit
reports on the wealth of state officials as regulated in Law No. 28/1999 on
clean governance (UU Penyelenggaraan Negara yang Bersih and Bebas dari
Korupsi, Kolusi dan Nepotisme).
The
role of the National Police Commission (Kompolnas) and the Prosecution
Commission (Komjak) is to supervise the performance of the police, public
prosecutor and Attorney General’s Office.
However,
neither of those commissions is effective. Kompolnas mostly acts as an
advisory body to the president and has no authority to conduct investigations
based on public complaints.
On
the other hand, Komjak has greater authority to supervise the performance of
the Attorney General’s Office but, in reality, their complaint mechanism has
not worked effectively.
There
is great demand to combine these external legal enforcement supervisory
bodies and increase their authority to allow scrutiny of day-to-day
operations.
Yudhoyono
was successful in corruption eradication in his first term, but he failed to
achieve the same for his second term because he mostly acted as chairman of
his Democrat Party instead of as president, as scholars also observed,
particularly given several Democrat officials becoming implicated in
corruption cases.
Political
scientists acknowledge the term of “punctuated equilibrium” — a phase or
moment in which total reform of an institution is possible given adequate
public support for reform at the time.
Once
that moment has passed, institutional reform becomes much more difficult.
It
may be a lack of spirit, moment or timing that has faced efforts of
institutional reform. At this moment, Jokowi has his punctuated equilibria to
conduct those reforms.
He
has no political baggage and has greater public support than Yudhoyono to do
what it takes to create significant change in Indonesia.
If
Jokowi uses his momentum to act as a bold innovator and to orchestrate the
reform needed in judicial enforcement, strengthen the KPK and the Corruption
Court, he will able to bring about real change and not just a promise of it
for Indonesia. ●
|
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar