Admitting
the problem of forest
Wahyudi Wardojo ; The writer is senior
advisor for terrestrial policy at Nature Conservancy-Indonesia Program and
former secretary-general of the Forestry Ministry
|
JAKARTA
POST, 07 Juli 2014
New
evidence has revealed that Indonesia is losing its forests at a rate far
greater than previously thought. How should we respond?
Indonesia’s
forests are some of the world’s greatest storehouses of species and carbon
and are some of the nation’s most valuable resources in terms of water
storage, climate regulation and livelihoods for millions of forest
communities.
The
forests also contain extraordinarily valuable timber, occupy highly
productive agricultural land and have vast mineral resources. Indonesia’s
development strategies to date have largely been built around exploiting
these natural resources and this creates tension between economic development
and the protection of forests.
The
Indonesian government has long recognized the importance of forests and has
adopted policies to help protect them.
There
are millions of hectares in legally protected national parks and nature
reserves, protection forests zoned to safeguard watersheds, and production forests
that allow selective logging but restrict conversion.
Indonesia
has been a world leader in the development of a national timber legality
assurance system to help combat illegal logging, and is now dramatically
expanding institutional capacity to manage national forests locally.
More
recently, the government has committed to measurably reducing greenhouse gas
emissions, largely through the improved protection of forests, and has
initiated a wide range of supporting policies.
Despite
these efforts, as Indonesia’s natural resource-based development continues to
speed up, the forests continue to be lost.
A
major new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change indicates that
more than 6 million hectares of primary forest were
lost
from 2000-2012 and the rate of loss nearly doubled during that period to
around 840,000 hectares in 2012.
The
University of Maryland study, titled Primary Forest Cover Loss in Indonesia
Over 2000-2012, was led by Indonesian researcher Belinda Arunarwati Margono
and was published in one of the world’s leading scientific journals.
The
study has mapped primary forests that retain their natural composition and
structure and have never been cleared and replanted.
Importantly,
this definition includes both “primary intact forests” that have never been
disturbed and “primary degraded forests” that have been previously logged.
These
primary “degraded” forests are still tremendously valuable for biodiversity,
utilization by local residents, the provision of watershed services and
carbon storage. They can also regenerate rapidly so managing them well is
critically important.
The
dynamics of forest loss on the major islands were analyzed separately, as
were different ecosystem types and different administrative areas. The study
revealed that around 28 percent of primary forest losses were in areas where
conversion was either prohibited or restricted.
About
31 percent of primary forest losses happened within areas zoned for
non-forest uses, highlighting the importance of detailed land use planning
for palm oil development and other land uses.
As
lowland forest areas decline, the conversion of wetlands has been increasing,
with dire consequences for greenhouse gas emissions. Given that 98 percent of
primary forest losses have happened as a second step following road building
and logging, Papua’s low rate of primary forest losses may be about to
change, following a period of expansive road building and logging.
The
moratorium on new concessions for the conversion of peat and natural forest,
a central component of the national Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and
Forest Degradation (REDD+) strategy, also warrants a review based on results
of this study.
The
term “natural forests” was used in the original plan for the moratorium, and
this aligns relatively well with the definition of “primary forest” used in
the study. This includes both intact and degraded forests that have natural
composition and structure.
In
implementation of the moratorium, however, the term was revised to focus only
on undisturbed forests, which was analogous to “primary intact forests”. What
is at risk by choosing not to prioritize the protection of “primary degraded
forests”?
With
this study, it is now relatively easy to independently analyze this type of
question, which could perhaps stimulate a discussion on other ways to enable
the protection of these valuable forests.
The
study provides valuable information for government decision-makers, local
communities, and many others with an interest in Indonesia’s forests. We
should all see this as a major opportunity to improve the management of the
nation’s forests.
Unfortunately,
the study is not in line with the government’s own deforestation data,
raising important questions about how the government will respond. The
Forestry Ministry reports that annual deforestation was around 1.1 million
hectares between 2000 and 2005 and that the rate declined to about 400,000
hectares a year between 2009 and 2011.
While
the methods and definitions vary between the recent study and the Forestry
Ministry, the fact that they show the exact opposite trend in forest losses
indicates a problem that needs to be addressed.
Advances
in satellite imagery mean that Indonesia’s forests can now be observed by
almost anyone with access to the Internet. Brazil, once the country with the
highest rate of forest loss in the world, was in a similar situation of being
confronted with evidence of high deforestation rates.
Beginning
in the 1980s, the Brazilian government invested in a world-class forest
monitoring system for its Amazon forest region, and its annual deforestation
reporting is widely seen as an indicative parameter of the government’s
commitment to sustainability, just as gross domestic product (GDP) is seen as
a reflection of economic growth. From 2005-2012 deforestation declined by
nearly 80 percent in Brazil’s Amazon region, at the same time as agricultural
commodity production in the region increased – a model that Indonesia could
replicate.
The
first step in solving any problem is admitting that there is one. How quickly
can Indonesia make the switch from resisting new information to admitting the
need for improvements to harness the right information to support effective
land use decision making and management?
It
is important for the government to start by being more transparent about its
data and methods and to work openly and quickly to improve the robustness of
the methodology to measure forest cover loss. Then it will be possible to
accurately assess conservation priorities and opportunities to improve the
management of forests.
Luckily,
large areas of primary forests still remain and continue to be important for
people and nature, but Indonesia is facing increasing competition for land
for food, fiber, forests, minerals, and energy.
Indonesia
needs to develop methods to appropriately value nature alongside economic
development opportunities, and then prioritize areas for conservation and
development.
Providing
good analysis to support stakeholders in this process is more important than
ever, and this requires accurate data, including forest cover maps.
The
results of the study, together with the approach of the dry season and the
threat of a drought-causing El Niño, are timely reminders of the threat
facing Indonesia’s forests.
The
failure to stem the growing rate of forest loss creates the risk of further
forest fire crises and other environmentally driven disasters, presenting a
significant challenge for the country’s new president.
His
willingness to admit the problem created by inadequate information and create
a culture among top government officials encouraging the integration of the
best science and objective analysis into decision-making is a crucial first
step.
It
may well determine whether Indonesia is able to protect its increasingly
threatened forests and the immense benefits they bring to the economy and to
millions of Indonesians. ●
|
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar