To
start fresh, dump excess baggage this election year
Ati Nubaiti ; A staff
writer at The Jakarta Post
|
JAKARTA
POST, 30 Maret 2014
Remnants
of the past will always be a barrier to progress, so it is up to today’s
generation and the ability of leaders to listen to them to dump unnecessary
baggage and move on.
There
are three recent examples of baggage weighing down the nation’s progress.
First,
the mindset that it is normal for high officials to receive gifts; second,
the notion that everyone misses Soeharto; and third, the idea we all yearn
for military figures in leadership positions. Spare us, please.
The
first example relates to justices blithely receiving iPods as souvenirs from
their colleagues’ parties, then saying to the Corruption Eradication
Commission (KPK): “We don’t think this is a gratuity that should be
returned.”
These
were justices of the Supreme Court, leaving one to wonder whether the court
will soon have its few remaining credible members wiped away with poison,
judging from the past unexplained deaths of a few good men in the civil and
military services.
KPK
chief Abraham Samad reminded us that it was the “lavish lifestyle” of high
public officials, not the iPods, which could lead to the “seeds of
corruption”.
The
judges’ reaction and their supporters in the Indonesian Judges Association
(Ikahi) showed us that high officials like them do not understand the widespread
resentment of habitual corruption and the continuous cheering for the KPK,
despite some shortcomings.
The
second example of excess baggage was evidenced by Golkar Party chief Aburizal
Bakrie. He almost drew pity as Golkar seemed to have nothing better to do
than to pitch the view, as he said, that Golkar benefits from the people’s
yearning for the good old days of the late president Soeharto.
Was
Aburizal drawing on the logic of Thaksin Shinawatra, the former Thai prime
minister said to draw the bulk of support from rural areas? Maybe many
farmers remember Soeharto’s gentle smile and his meetings with them, and
mainly the more intensive training of farmers compared to today.
Yet
Aburizal’s statement is in contrast to the work of new and old Golkar members
who have apparently been trying to adjust themselves to the aspirations of a
more democratic nation, with freedoms that Soeharto never allowed.
Indonesian
Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) chairperson Megawati Soekarnoputri and
her underlings are doing much to tone down anyone’s merry feelings
surrounding Jakarta Governor Joko “Jokowi” Widodo being nominated
presidential candidate of the PDI-P.
While
anything Mega says is a mystery until D-Day, when she decides on a clear
statement, PDI-P suggestions that a military man might do for vice president
just reflect another example of an old mindset detached from today’s
developments — though the suggestion might just be one of the PDI-P’s tricks
to gain public input.
In the
chaotic post-Soeharto years, many among us looked around for a strong, firm
figure, and all the political parties, including the PDI-P, approached
retired military officers just as they approached celebrities.
Then,
retired general Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono became the first twice-directly
elected president. He went at lengths to say all the right things for a
leader of an emerging democracy and also showed all the signs of a new age,
sensitive male with a lot of tears. In the end no one got a “strong and firm”
figure from the retired general, and his musical talents became compared to
Gen. (ret) Wiranto.
We do
need the Indonesian Military (TNI) of course, but for what? The TNI must
continue to reform so it becomes professional and more equipped to safeguard
the archipelago; to completely drop dwi fungsi (dual role of the armed
forces) as it promised, instead of trying to take a slow U-turn right back to
the New Order principal of dual function, or having the military active in
defense and non-defense matters, meaning all spheres of national life.
Together
with civilians, the TNI must end impunity as a central way of achieving
professionalism and accountability. Otherwise, we should not be surprised why
human rights classes at the police and military academies are taking so long
to show evidence of a reformed National Police and TNI.
It is
this failure of military reform that has taken a great chunk out of any
credibility that the military might still have. The old guard may say the
civilians really love the military personnel around them, that is why
territorial commands have been increased rather than reduced; or that
civilians allowed the country to become so chaotic and even attacked by
terrorists and could become even worse if they, the military, do not take
charge.
The
hundreds of retired officers showing support for presidential candidate
Prabowo Subianto on Thursday would do the nation a great service if they
understood why we need the military, and why we don’t.
The
civilian bureaucracy and politicians have also been hard to reform, but at
least they do not shoot their superiors when they are angry, as is the
suspected motive of the latest shooting of a police officer by his
subordinate.
So let
us drop all this excess baggage — the cluelessness of our fight against graft
and the yearning for the Soeharto era and a military leader, regardless of
the much needed reform of civil-military ties.
It is
such notions that have bogged us down all these long years after 1998 and
will serve to keep us in the dumps.
Our
youth deserves much, much better. ●
|
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar