Wanted :
Democratic Party Chief
Donny Syofyan ; A Lecturer in the Faculty of
Cultural Sciences
at
Andalas University, Padang
|
|
JAKARTA
POST, 07 Maret 2013
Seeking a likely replacement for ousted Democratic
Party chairman Anas Urbaningrum, who stepped down after being charged in
the Hambalang graft case, is a top priority for the party. Many party
politicians do not want the position left empty for too long, concerned as
they are about the need to prepare for the 2014 election.
A great number
of candidates are emerging, including House of Representatives’ Speaker
Marzuki Alie, lawmaker Ruhut Sitompul and current Army chief of staff Gen.
Pramono Edhie Wibowo, who is also President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono’s
brother-in-law.
Whoever is
elected to become the party’s new chief, he must focus on cleaning and
restructuring the party to restore an image tainted by numerous graft
scandals. The new chairman, therefore, should be from within the party;
such a move would show the party’s clear-cut mechanism of political
regeneration. There should be no non-member candidates because the
Democratic Party was built as a party of membership; outsiders cannot just
barge in. This is about ethics marked by prioritizing the members over
people who happen to be outsiders.
Indeed, based
on his decision to take over the party leadership following the naming of
Anas as a graft suspect, it is likely that Yudhoyono will favor his
brother-in-law to become chairman. When it comes to trust, it is difficult
to remain professional. Sometimes trust causes someone to choose based on
preference rather than rational thought.
Putting one of
his family members into the party leadership makes sense since Yudhoyono
still intends to retain a firm grip on the Democratic Party. Such an
approach, however, could have perilous consequences since the Democrats
would be considered anti-reform-minded. Judging from the electorate’s
perspective, the Democratic Party may eventually be shunned by young voters
and professionals who want to see fundamental changes in various sectors.
The party could survive if Yudhoyono cleaned it up and then allow the party
members to choose their own chief rather than planting oligarchic seeds.
However, all
the party executives and members need to bear in mind the bigger picture.
Any efforts to solidify the party are not to be compromised. Yudhoyono
should announce the candidates and allow the party to familiarize
themselves with them before making a choice. Despite the possible tension
between Anas’ proponents and Yudhoyono’s supporters, a new chairman chosen
from among existing Democrats would be much more representative and
legitimate. The friction between the two sides could be reconciled if the
party were to proceed based on and bolstered by collective leadership
instead of relying upon one person. Along with party unity, the party’s new
leader would not be allowed to run for president in the 2014 election due
to its transitional nature.
Furthermore,
strong emphasis on collective and transitional leadership is instrumental
in pushing the Democrats to become far-sighted statesmen. The electorate
views the Democratic Party as suffering from a drought of statesmen but a
flood of politicians. While statesmen busy themselves with promoting
wide-scale solidarity on a regular basis, politicians limit their political
practices to mere power retention, regardless of place and time.
It is of
paramount importance that the new party chairman be a rallying figure. It
is necessary since what is taking place in the Democratic Party is not
simply ordinary political fallout but a potentially irreversible political
rift, characterized by some local party leaders abandoning ship and leaving
the party. Nevertheless, speculation that Anas’ imminent exit would pave
the way for a mass exodus has proved to be largely unfounded, as Anas’
“loyalists” still remain in the party. However, political tension within
the party has increased with Yudhoyono supporters demanding that the
Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) immediately detain Anas in relation
to the recent graft allegations.
As a rallying
figure, the new chairman needs to be supported by adequate political
infrastructure. He needs to consolidate the party’s central board as a
political organ capable of managing the daily affairs of the party on the
one side and strengthen the local leaders’ support base on the other. The
party’s new chief is supposed to ensure that no members interfere with or
become affected by the legal case beleaguering Anas. To put it simply, the
party’s supporters and members should form organized political networks
under the new chairmanship.
The new
chairman will also encounter an equally substantive need; namely, the need
to formulate a common agenda taking into account common platforms and
points of dispute among the party’s executives and members. Those claiming
to be tenacious fighters for democracy in the party actually still have
disparate agendas on substantive issues and tend to approach challenges
with shallow thinking. As a result, mutual support among the party’s
politicians has been substituted by endless political recrimination among
its leaders and members. ●
|
|
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar