Jokowi’s
agenda for civil service reform
Steve Woodhouse OBE ;
UNICEF
representative to Indonesia from 1995-2000 and was UNICEF regional director
for Europe
|
JAKARTA
POST, 11 Agustus 2014
There is widespread dislike of self-important, uniformed,
corrupt and deeply un-customer-friendly officials that blight the lives of
ordinary citizens throughout Indonesia. The requirements of long waits;
bribery; uncomfortable, crowded, waiting rooms; queue jumping and excessive
bureaucracy make life difficult for all.
With president-elect Joko “Jokowi” Widodo’s commitment to and
personal understanding and empathy with the masses, there are several steps
he can introduce to dramatically improve the situation, many of which can
produce quick results, thus shoring up popular support for him to
counterbalance other policies such as a fuel subsidy reduction that may not
be so popular.
The establishment of a strong, independent civil service
commission to oversee in a participatory and consultative manner the
establishment of clear standards, attitudinal requirements and processes for
the recruitment of civil servants would be a good initial move. The
involvement of information technology professionals drawing on relevant
experience from ASEAN neighbors and others could be tasked with streamlining
and reducing paper requirements and processes, as the Indonesian bureaucratic
process is heavier than most of its neighbors, and produces little added value
except for the bureaucrats.
The actual process of interviewing new, incoming candidates for
front line jobs interacting with the general public needs review to include
role-play testing of their friendliness of attitude and respect toward the
poor in particular, along with other methods to ensure that individuals with
positive pro-poor attitudes are recruited. Knowledge and skill can be easily
developed but attitudes are much more difficult to change.
Participatory pre-service training needs major attention,
introducing new methodologies of problem solving using judgment balanced with
initiative and based on clear standards of performance that can be easily
measured, such as waiting times for licenses — “no one should wait more than
10 minutes” — for example and other applications by customers for which
similarly specific measurable performance standards can be developed. The
provision of transparent bonuses and other incentives such as accelerated
promotion and increased opportunities for in-service training for posting to
difficult duty stations should help to the point recruits to apply for these
difficult places rather than be reluctantly drafted or paying to be posted in
attractive duty stations.
Most important will be the introduction of performance management
systems that include anonymous and honest assessments by the general public
on the quality of service provided by front line civil servants, with this
assessment directly influencing bonus payments and other incentives for
well-performing customer friendly officials.
Yes, supervisors need to supervise and their assessment of their
supervisees remains important, but customers also need to assess performance
from their standpoint. The standards of performance must be clear, measurable
and understood by all.
Benchmarks and requirements for promotion need to be spelt out
and shared with all, with a stress on both customer service and the good
management of all types.
Higher level civil servants at the managerial level and above
need to have their own performance measured by the degree to which their
subordinates function effectively with a true pro-poor customer service
mentality. An attitude of wanting to nurture subordinates and get the best
out of their potential needs to be a marker for promotion to ever more senior
levels.
Through both pre-service and in-service training, the
understanding that civil service salaries are paid for by the general public
through taxes needs to be fully internalized by civil servants as one of many
measures to promote an attitude that civil servants exist to serve the
general public rather than the other way round. A transparent complaints
mechanism for poor performance including corruption, nepotism, favoritism and
anti-poor behavior by civil servants needs to be developed and widely
disseminated.
Above all, the independent civil service commission that I
propose must monitor progress and continuously adjust the system and balance
of rewards and sanctions for good or poor performance, so there is a smaller
but much better paid civil service that can be admired and supported by a
newly united Indonesian general public under the leadership of
president-elect Jokowi. ●
|
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar