Tampilkan postingan dengan label Adisti Sukma Sawitri. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Adisti Sukma Sawitri. Tampilkan semua postingan

Kamis, 09 Oktober 2014

Failure of reconciliation, a taster for the pawns

Failure of reconciliation, a taster for the pawns

Adisti Sukma Sawitri  ;   A staff writer at The Jakarta Post
JAKARTA POST,  07 Oktober 2014




Even before president-elect Joko “Jokowi” Widodo is inaugurated, it has become clear there is no easy way to run his five years of tenure.

In just two weeks, the Red-and-White Coalition, initially built as a vessel to nominate former army general Prabowo Subianto in the presidential election, has cemented a parliamentary bloc against Jokowi’s coalition through the ruthless passage of the Regional Elections (Pilkada) Law and the establishment of new leaders at the House of Representatives.

President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and his Democratic Party have proven they are more interested in investing in their future political clout than siding with the people. While trying to save direct elections by issuing a government regulation in lieu of law (Perppu) to annul the law, his goodwill has become fruit for further skepticism.

Yudhoyono’s party was a useful sidekick to the Red-and-White Coalition (earlier commanding 282 seats) with their walkout during the law’s deliberation. In the session to decide the new House leadership, the party faction — less than half of their previous batch appearing — obtained a deputy speaker post alongside representatives from the Red-and-White Coalition.

Therefore Prabowo’s coalition practically commands 353 seats including the Democrat’s 61 seats, despite Yudhoyono’s claim to be a “balancing” force.

Yudhoyono’s Perppu may now seal support from the Democrats to repeal the Pilkada Law.

However, unlike in the previous House, in which they were the largest party, the Democrats’ favor is currently not enough.

Jokowi’s coalition of 207 seats is still at the mercy of Golkar Party members (91 seats), some of whom supported the direct elections during the controversial Pilkada voting, or others from smaller parties like the National Mandate Party (PAN) and the United Development Party (PPP).

Judicial review petitions at the Constitutional Court to scrap articles regulating elections via regional legislative councils (DPRDs) may promise a better chance to amend the law.

While Yudhoyono, the Democrats and the Red-and-White Coalition are the main culprits for the robbery of people’s right to vote in local elections, Jokowi and his coalition of parties led by the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) are also responsible for failing to show leadership after the presidential election.

As president-elect and the winner of the legislative election, Jokowi and the PDI-P failed to reconcile the polarizing of the House and society caused by the elections.

They have placed themselves as the victor, eagerly anticipating the award — the transfer of power from Yudhoyono’s administration — while making no real action to bring the country together.

Securing 53 percent of about 133 million votes during the election, Jokowi and the PDI-P have overvalued their victory. Jokowi and his running mate Jusuf Kalla may have beaten Prabowo and Hatta Rajasa by 8 million votes, large enough to give a decisive win even after being challenged at the Constitutional Court. But the number is merely 6 percent of the total number of voters. Prabowo and Hatta received support from almost half of Indonesian voters.

The PDI-P, which garnered 18.95 percent of votes during the legislative election, was no better a winner than Yudhoyono’s Democrats who secured 20.85 percent in 2009.

Despite these slim margins of victory, the PDI-P has shown no serious attempts to gain more allies at the House. Inviting only the PPP and the PAN to its national assembly in Semarang, party chairperson Megawati Soekarnoputri gave both a cold welcome by reminding them that the invitations were no assurance of ministerial posts.

Such an ungraceful political gesture seemed even more like arrogance as Jokowi had announced that he would give up almost half of the posts in his Cabinet to political parties, even those from outside his coalition. Jokowi has followed Yudhoyono’s conservative tradition of trading ministerial posts for strong government, which seems not to be good enough for Megawati.

Megawati as party chief and the country’s former president has refused to repair her relationship with Yudhoyono, which has been sour for a decade ever since the latter, once serving in her Cabinet, beat her in two presidential elections.

In a stalled lobby between the Democratic Party and the PDI-P to form a coalition to secure the House leadership last week, Megawati still refused to reconcile with Yudhoyono.

Jokowi and the PDI-P have always claimed each attack from other parties as a betrayal of the people’s voice. What they may not realize is that winning elections is not like a winning a jackpot. Election winners are not only granted power, but also acquire the responsibility to protect and accommodate every citizen and element in the country, including those who don’t support them.

If they are always calling for people’s action to make up for their political ineptitude, it will be an exhausting five years for citizens. Efforts to challenge the Pilkada Law at the Constitutional Court may only be a start. Each parliamentary failure at the House may spawn another unpopular law ahead. In the end, voters are left to save themselves from the harm of the failures.

Praising Jokowi and the PDI-P and condemning those who oppose him will not help the presidentelect to win any cause. Jokowi and the PDI-P should avoid using people as their political pawn like the Red-and-White Coalition did when they revoked direct elections in the Pilkada Law.

In order to do this, Jokowi should initiate a bold move to start reconciliation. As the next president, he should make sure that when he makes a decision, he considers all Indonesian citizens, not only his voters, or even his political party.

Because each time he disappoints his people, he wilts another hope in their hearts. ●

Sabtu, 20 September 2014

A chance of nobility for Golkar in Pilkada controversy

A chance of nobility for Golkar in Pilkada controversy

Adisti Sukma Sawitri  ;   A staff writer at The Jakarta Post
JAKARTA POST, 17 September 2014

                                                                                                                       
                                                      

A change in the political tide, by abnegating direct elections, is the latest peril that losing presidential candidate Prabowo Subianto has brought to the country.

After recovering from his dramatic attempt to overturn the election results at the Constitutional Court, Indonesian voters now have to face the maneuvers by the political parties in his Red-and-White Coalition to reinstate the election of local leaders by regional legislative councils (DPRDs) in the regional elections (Pilkada) bill.

The coalition has severed its ties with public aspirations and has decided instead to voice the grievances of one man, Prabowo, who suffered an epic defeat at the hands of a local politician, now president-elect Joko “Jokowi” Widodo, who Prabowo believes was launched from Surakarta onto the national scene.

Red-and-White Coalition members argue that regional direct elections have led to expensive politics and are sources of controversy, an irony given Prabowo’s multi-billion rupiah legal challenges to the presidential election results at the court and the Election Organization Ethics Council (DKPP) — let alone the cost of mobilizing his supporters to stage rallies in opposition to the election results.

It is most galling to see the Golkar Party, the legislative election runner-up, which secured more votes than Prabowo’s Gerindra party, choosing to join Prabowo’s broken-hearted ballad rather than presenting a strategic plan for the country’s political future.

Golkar is a major source of unspoken opposition that has vexed President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono’s administration. Despite its nominal status as part of the ruling government coalition Golkar has previously pushed for an inquiry into the Bank Century scandal that has seen former Bank Indonesia (BI) officials brought to court for corruption, and a possible trial of Vice President Boediono for his role as then BI governor.

Along with another coalition member, the Prosperous Justice Party (PKS), Golkar supported another inquiry into a tax-mafia scandal that triggered a reshuffle of Yudhoyono’s Cabinet in 2011.

Thus, only Golkar party chairman Aburizal Bakrie, who is himself prone to dismissal after Prabowo’s defeat, can answer why Golkar is still one of Prabowo’s cheerleaders rather than gathering itself up to be a decent voice of legislative opposition.

Golkar’s support for elections via the DPRDs is merely an echo of the party’s former glory days as supporter of the authoritarian Soeharto regime. Proof that Golkar, despite its cunning political maneuvers during Yudhoyono’s term in office, remains a relic of Soeharto’s New Order era.

Direct regional elections came about in the same vein as regional autonomy, a departure from Soeharto’s centralized grip on regions that led to unequal development across the regions.

The idea of regional autonomy itself, however, is almost as old as the nation, a consequence of its geographic situation as an archipelago, in which regions are divided by sea, making each island unique, with notable differences among them.

Barbara Harvey’s Permesta: Half A Rebellion tells the story of how the idea of regional autonomy emerged from the birth of the nation in 1945, with none other than Prabowo’s late father, Soemitro Djojohadikusumo, as one of the staunchest supporters of the aspiration.

Following the end of Dutch rule the high authority and privileged position of local leaders had become commonplace with Army officers or a privileged nobility becoming “minor kings” with almost absolute power to control local natural resources and the citizens’ wellbeing.

The various geographic conditions were also challenging to a one-size-fits-all policy. The country’s first general election in 1955, which was perceived as having failed to bring better representatives into the government through Cabinet membership, sparked disappointment in the regions and triggered the formation of rebel groups. The PRRI (Revolutionary Government of the Indonesian Republic) movement in Sumatra and Permesta (People’s Rebellion) in Sulawesi were among the significant rebel groups that emerged in the 1950s.

Soemitro’s siding with the Permesta rebel group brought upon him “traitor” status from first president Sukarno and he remained a political outcast until Soeharto asked him to join his Cabinet.

Following the pilkada bill controversy, regional heads who have emerged from direct elections have also voiced opposition to the Red-and-White Coalition’s proposal, which has so far proven itself to be no more than the epitome of elite political revenge rather than an act to defend the public’s interest.

Golkar, as the biggest part of the coalition, now has a decent excuse to leave Prabowo by supporting direct elections in the bill legislation. This move might also open the way to Jokowi’s future administration. After all vice president-elect Jusuf Kalla, who is still a Golkar party member, is a bridge for the party to Jokowi’s coalition.

As one of the country’s most successful political parties, which has survived many political conjunctures and remains one of the most effective vote gatherers, Golkar has the chance to stand above Prabowo’s emotional baggage.

Golkar can lead other members of the Red-and-White Coalition to prove that they side with the people, instead of with Prabowo, A chance to prove that rather than promoting a fruitless political ambition, it is nobler to stand and defend the rights of the people who supported them in the legislative election.

And for Prabowo, nothing would suit him better these days than to learn more about the legacy of his father. ●