KPK
vs Polri :
Children
of light and children of darkness
Jim Clough ; The writer is studying
International Relations
at RMIT University in Melbourne, Australia
|
JAKARTA
POST, 18 Februari 2015
President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo’s decision to name Comr.
Gen. Budi Gunawan as the sole candidate for Indonesia’s top cop spot drew
much public criticism following the Corruption Eradication Commission’s (KPK)
eleventh hour decision to name the three-star general a graft suspect.
The President’s decision is largely seen as a concession
to his political patron, Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P)
chairperson Megawati Soekarnoputri, who Budi served as a security aide during
her tenure as president.
Tensions escalated with startling swiftness when the
police, in what appeared to be a blatant act of retaliation, arrested KPK
deputy Bambang Widjojanto for perjury in a local election dispute back in
2010.
Reports have also been submitted against other KPK
deputies; and on Monday a court ruled that the KPK’s decision to name Budi a
graft suspect was invalid.
The feud between the well-respected KPK and the
notoriously corrupt National Police (Polri) highlights the perils of
democratic society, especially in a developing country such as Indonesia.
In his critique of democratic society the theologian
Reinhold Niebuhr claims that the world is inhabited by two sets of people,
“the children of light and the children of darkness”. The children of darkness
are those “[…] who know no law beyond their will and interest”, whereas the
children of light are “[…] those who seek to bring self-interest under
the discipline of a more universal law and in harmony with
a more universal good”.
By Niebuhr’s definition weren’t both the National Police
and the KPK created by the children of light? The KPK is tasked with
eradicating corruption and bringing justice to those that seek to better
their own interests at the expense of society, whereas the Police are charged
with maintaining law and order, along with serving and protecting the
citizens.
Why then are they at each other’s throats?
In our most optimistic moments we might like to think of
the Police as children of light, shaping our society for the better, but they
are however regarded as a corrupting influence on Indonesia’s democracy,
popularly considered one of the most corrupt institutions in Indonesia,
second only to the House of Representatives.
The Police, once under the arm of the military during the
autocratic reign of Soeharto, became an independent institution following his
downfall.
The Police’s track record has been questionable and mixed
at best.
Niebuhr argues that democratic civilization was built not
by children of darkness but by foolish and naïve children of light, who
failed to consider the true power of self-interest, be it within individuals
or collectively as a society.
Furthermore, he states that the children of darkness are
wiser than their altruistic counterparts because they understand the power of
self-interest.
The formation of the National Police or even Indonesia’s
democracy in the Reform Era are striking examples of how the children of
light naively attempted to build a democratic and civil society under a fair
and just creed, expecting the country and its people to abide by it.
Alas, the “wiser” children of darkness have been able to
make covert use of the democratic and civil creed to twist it to their own
devices and special interests.
Even before Monday’s verdict Comr. Gen. Budi, despite
being a man of the law, had failed to report to the KPK’s summons for
questioning.
The KPK itself one of the few bastions of relative good
specifically tasked to fight against self-interest, i.e. corruption, faces a
bleak future; President Jokowi, heralded as a man of the people who promised
to champion their right to and aspirations for a better country, has been
hesitant to take significant action for fear of political backlash by his own
party.
Niebuhr states that to preserve democratic civilization,
the children of light must arm themselves with the wisdom of the children of
darkness but refrain from its malevolence.
They must understand the power of self-interest within
human society, but not give it moral justification. “They must have this
wisdom in order that they may beguile, deflect, harness and restrain
self-interest […] for the sake of the community”.
Whether Jokowi attempts to garner closer ties with his
former presidential election rival Prabowo Subianto and the Red-and-White
Coalition (KMP) or with the Indonesian Military (TNI), so-called rivals to
the police, to balance the playing field and give him more maneuverability
remains to be seen.
But wisdom, restraint from self-interest and the courage
to act will be the prerequisites if President Jokowi wishes to be seen as a
child of light, and a capable one at that.
Jokowi has been hesitant to take significant action for
fear of political backlash by his own party. ●
|
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar