Boxing
culture taints coalition building
Donny Syofyan ;
A
lecturer at the Faculty of Culture at Andalas University, Padang
|
JAKARTA
POST, 04 Mei 2014
The
legislative election has culminated in two astounding results.
First,
the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) looks set to fail to meet
its target of securing 27 percent of the vote, after various quick counts
revealed it won only around 19 percent.
Second,
the Islamic parties fared much better than expected with a combined count of
31.9 percent of the vote.
The
search for coalitions to secure particular candidates in the race for the
presidency has lost its way following the rampant boxing culture of
mainstream politicians. Such a culture is first and foremost marked by
lukewarm political consolidation.
The
parties’ commitment to boosting their share of the popular vote is not
compatible with their power-hungry politicians. National or religion-based
parties are tied to this half-hearted commitment.
While
the PDI-P fell into an internal schism following the over confidence of its
politicians and its scapegoating mentality, the United Development Party
(PPP) dissolved into chaos as top party officials argued over whether the
party would support Gerindra Party presidential candidate Prabowo Subianto or
other aspirants.
The
PPP’s infighting saw its chairman Suryadharma Ali fire several executives. In
a counter move, the party’s top brass suspended Suryadharma for violating
party rules by opting for Prabowo.
Despite
a reconciliatory meeting, there is no guarantee the rift is over.
Such
problems are rampant in the parties as they are full of pure politicians, not
statesmen.
With the
politicians steering the parties, conflicts in communication, disputes over
who makes political decisions and the desire for power are inevitable.
The
politicians may have overlooked the wise words of founding vice president
Mohammad Hatta, who coined the phrase: “The politics of salt, not the
politics of lipstick.”
Parties
with more politicians and less statesmen will never appeal to a wider
audience since voters are more attracted to and take credence in parties
stressing diversity and inclusion.
The
power of diversity is unleashed when those politicians respect and value
differences such as a readiness to accept outsiders, focus on people’s needs
over ruling elites and ensure the right conditions are in place for the
public to access parties’ decision making processes.
The
Indonesian political arena has changed drastically over the past several
years. The people have also changed; their access to information has
expanded, they are now more exposed to different opinions and ideas, so
parties should apply an open door culture.
The
boxing culture in the political arena has worsened as nationalist or
religion-based parties struggle to patch up disparities.
Nationalist
parties like the PDI-P are yet to engage in an intense communication with the
majority of Islamic parties. Islamic parties are struggling to find, unite
and nominate their own presidential candidate.
Things
get more difficult if some Islamic parties leave a coalition of Islamic
parties behind. With the National Mandate Party (PAN) and Prosperous Justice
Party (PKS) moving closer to Gerindra, and the National Awakening Party (PKB)
about to seal a coalition agreement with the PDI-P, it may be no longer
relevant to separate Islamic parties from nationalist parties.
A major
stumbling block facing Islamic parties is the fact that there is no single
Muslim figure with enough electability and popularity to compete with
presidential candidates from the nationalist parties.
This
country will not benefit from the constant, yawning gap between nationalist
and Islamic parties.
The best
thing would be a shared vision of religious nationalism. Smarter voters
realize that religious symbols should not be subject to political abuse.
Instead
of spending energy on finding their own presidential candidate, the Islamic
parties would be better off focusing on proposing vice presidential hopefuls
in response to widely circulated presidential candidates.
Jusuf
Kalla could be regarded as a middle-of-the-road statesman and politician
whose acceptability goes beyond nationalist and Islamic political camps.
The
Islamic parties’ emphasis on a shared platform — religious nationalism or
nationalist religiosity — and vice presidential candidates, due to the
absence of leadership figures, is the key to unlocking the political
cul-de-sac concerning national and Islamic parties.
Hatta’s
main legacy, “the politics of salt, not
the politics of lipstick”, seems to be the blissful end of a raging
boxing culture amid tensions between the nationalist and Islamic parties. ●
|
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar